He is possibly named and depicted in TT 226, a tomb for the royal tutor Heqareshu, constructed during the reign of Amenhotep III. In a fragmentary scene from this tomb Heqareshu is shown in the company of four royal children. Two of these are now nameless. The other two bear names of the form Aakheper[...]re. One of those is probably the royal son, here described, and the name of the other prince has been reconstructed as Aakheper[en]re or Aakheper[ka]re. Considering how Heqareshu had an active career as a royal tutor under Kings Amenhotep II, Thutmose IV and possibly Amenhotep III, all three Kings have been named as possible fathers to these four princes. Amenhotep II however seems to be the best candidate. One of his sons, the later Thutmose IV, was depicted in a different tomb (TT 64, the last resting place of Heqaerneheh, Heqareshu's son) as a miniature King on the lap of Heqareshu, showing a similar tutor/pupil relationship. It is but an easy conclusion to make that the (other) four pupils of Heqareshu were all sons of Amenhotep II as well. There is however some reason for reserve.
The name of a prince Aakheperure (here in an undamaged form) is also found in graffiti at Konosso (numbered 23 and 32), inscriptions that can be dated to the reign of Thutmose IV. Usually this Aakheperure is considered to be the same as the one mentioned in TT 226. This could signify that the prince outlived his father Amenhotep II as a younger brother of Thutmose IV. Now the mention of a reigning 18th Dynasty King's son is already strikingly exceptional. Apart from these Konosso graffiti any possible reference to a reigning 18th Dynasty King's brother is however completely nonexistent - and most likely deliberately so. This would make it plausible that Aakheperure was actually a son instead of a brother to Thutmose IV, thereby contradicting the apparent logic of regarding the four TT 226 princes as the sons of Amenhotep II (or as belonging to one single generation).
|
